🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," said one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly occurring at the state government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, other states are also taking action.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this global discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that governments globally are less and less content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.